Academic feminism is so full of buzzwords and doublespeak. Today's word is Intersectionality.
Crenshaw coined the term as an explanation of why black and immigrant women's experiences ended up being ignored by both feminism and the anti-racist movement.
Huh. I've got an explanation. Feminism is dominated by middle class white women, and the issues of minorities are only a concern as in their usefulness to feminism to get more victim power.
If feminism doesn't actively recognise that there are a lot of women whose most pressing concerns aren't boardroom representation and lingerie football, the movement is going to carry on alienating itself from those most in need of assistance.
From the piggie's mouth. Feminism doesn't care about equality or justice, unless you're a white woman.
So why is it taking so long for mainstream feminists to follow? Why are discussions of race, class, and disability within feminism so often characterised as infighting, or sideshows to the main event? Could it be that, for some strange reason, marginalised women's experiences with intersectionality and its usefulness are systematically ignored and discredited?
Interesting choice of words. Feminism is about leveraging the value of victimhood in order to gain power and resources for itself. Feminists recognize the higher victim value of being a minority woman, and want that victimhood for themselves. Intersectionality is their Orwellian attempt to co-opt the issues of minorites into feminism, and make it available for all women.
And just because the Animal Farm reference is glaring at this point.